Preventing Audit Quality Risks in Independent Audit: A Road Map in the Light of Theoretical Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16457476Schlagworte:
Audit Quality, Quality Risks, Audit Quality Standards, Audit Quality Management SystemAbstract
An independent audit is a critical system for ensuring that a company's financial statements are accurate and reliable. However, the quality risks inherent in the detail of the audit make it difficult to deploy this function effectively. These risks, which are composed of variables such as accounting standards, auditing techniques, management strategies and technological developments, need to be controlled. The purpose of this study is to provide theoretical and practical ways to prevent quality risks in auditing and to establish an effective quality management system. In this study management structure, technological infrastructure, professional standards, external service providers and factors; have been examined the causes and solutions of these risks were examined using theoretical frameworks such as the systems approach, organization theory, source and emission theory.
The study continues to emphasize that the governance structure and the adoption of corporate governance policies are crucial to enhance supervision. It was stated that audits should ensure continuous compliance, perform a risk-focused practice, and establish a dynamic quality management system. The study concluded that audit credibility can be enhanced by working in harmony with technical and organizational elements. Effective management, adherence to ethical values, technological integration and compliance protection are the most prominent factors in sustainably maintaining the audit. Audit intervals should be supported through continuous training and technology compliance programs, and cooperation and information sharing in audit networks should be improved. This study provides a summary guide to improving the efficiency of audit funding and summarizing quality risks.
Literaturhinweise
Akçay, A., & Bilen, A. (2018). Denetim Kalitesi ve Göstergeleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (40), 227-256.
Altıntaş, T. (2007). Halka Açık Şirketlerin Bağımsız Denetiminin Kalitesinin Algılanmasına İlişkin bir Araştırma. Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
DAMA (2013). The Six Primary Dimensions For Data Quality Assessment: Defining Data Quality Dimensions. UK: DAMA UK Working Group.
Daryanto, A., Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Patterson, P. (2009). Service Firms And Customer Loyalty Programs: A Regulatory Fit Perspective Of Reward Preferences In A Health Club Setting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(5), 604-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0165-x
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 83-199.
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Archival Auditing Research. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
Durukan, M. B., & İkız, A. K. (2007). Denetim Kalitesi, Kalite Ve Hizmet Kalitesine Ilişkin Modeller: Kavramsal Çerçeve. Mali Cozum Dergisi/Financial Analysis, (82).35-62.
Dülge, S. (2009). Bilgi Yönetimi Çözümleri Ve Iş Zekâsı Projelerinde Veri Kalitesi Yönetimi Uygulamaları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi.
Editors, T. (2014). Has Institutional Theory Lost Its Way? Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1204-1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12108
Ertaş, F. C. & Güven, P. (2008). Bilgi Teknolojilerinin Denetim Sürecine Etkileri . Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (37), 50-59. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mufad/issue/35611/395668
Gantz, S. D. (2013). The Basics Of IT Audit: Purposes, Processes, And Practical Information. Waltham: Elsevier.
Geng, D., Lai, K., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Eco-Innovation and Its Role For Performance Improvement Among Chinese Small And Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107869
Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2013). Quality Management For Organizational Excellence:. Introduction To Total Quality. London: Pearson, ISBN 978-0132558983.
Gonzalès, R. and Parrott, L. (2012). Network Theory In The Assessment Of The Sustainability of Social–Ecological Systems. Geography Compass, 6(2), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00470.x
Gryna, F. M. (2001). Quality Planning and Analysis, 4th edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Güzel, F., & Kurşunel, F. (2015). Kalite Maliyetleri ve Veri Kalitesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 15(29), 282-301.
Hassan, N. A., Zailani, S., & Rahman, M. K. (2021). Impact Of Integrated Audit Management Effectiveness on Business Sustainability In Manufacturing Firms. Management Research Review, 44(12), 1599-1622. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-10-2020-0658
Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of Value From Fit.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140-1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
Hillman, A., Withers, M., & Collins, B. (2009). Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
Jiang, H., Luo, Y., Xia, J., Hitt, M. A., & Song, J. (2022). Resource Dependence Theory In International Business: Progress And Prospects. Global Strategy Journal, 13(1), 3-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1467
Kamu Gözetleme Kurumu (2023a). “Kalite Yönetim Standardı 1”. https://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/Duyurular/v2/KKS/KYS%201_RG.pdf. Erişim tarihi:10.08.2023.
Kamu Gözetleme Kurumu (2023b). “Kalite Yönetim Standardı 2”. https://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/Duyurular/v2/KKS/KYS%201_RG.pdf. Erişim tarihi:10.08.2023.
Kamu Gözetleme Kurumu (2023c). “Bağımsız Denetim Standardı 220 (Revize)”. https://www.kgk.gov.tr/Portalv2Uploads/files/Duyurular/v2/KKS/BDS%20220_RG.pdf. Erişim tarihi:10.08.2023.
Karahan, M., & Kestane, A. (2021). Muhasebe Bilgi Kalitesinin Maliyet Analizi Süreçlerine Etkisi: Muhasebe Meslek Mensupları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(14), 117-129.
Kassem, R. (2018). Assessing Management Integrity: Insights From Big 4 Auditors In Egypt. Current Issues in Auditing, 12(1), A29-A39. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-52117
Keçecioğlu, T.(1998). Liderlik ve Liderler. İstanbul: KalDer Yayınları
Knechel, W. R. (2016). Audit Quality and Regulation. International Journal of Auditing. 20(3), 215- 223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12077
Knechel, W. R., Krıshnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchık, L. B. & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit Quality: Insights From The Academic Literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 385-421. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350
Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 Versus Non-Big 4 Differences In Audit-Quality Proxies Be Attributed To Client Characteristics?. The accounting review, 86(1), 259-286.
Mantovani, D. and Tazima, D. I. (2016). Visual Art And Regulatory Fit Messages On Consumer Evaluations. Revista De Administração De Empresas, 56(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020160203
McAdam, R., Miller, K., & McSorley, C. (2019). Towards A Contingency Theory Perspective of Quality Management In Enabling Strategic Alignment. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003
Mutlu, A. T., & Durmaz, Y. (2021). Bankaların Satış Ve Pazarlama Faaliyetlerinin Incelenmesi Ve Oluşan Hizmet Kalitesinin Ölçülmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(5), 1309-1331.
Patrick, M.J. (2004). The PCOAB and The Future of Oversight. Journal of Accountancy, 198 (6),98-101.
Polojärvi, D., Palmer, E., & Dunford, C. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of Sociotechnical Systems In Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering, 26(4), 482-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21664
Reeves, C. A., & Bednar, D. A. (1994). Defining Quality: Alternatives and Implications. Academy of management Review, 19(3), 419-445.
Savcı, M., & Balioğlu, İ. (2021). Muhasebe Bilgi Sisteminde Veri Kalitesinin Denetim Kanıtlarının Güvenilirliğine Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 6(1), 52-63.
Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges For Institutional Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492609347564
Titman, S., & Trueman, B. (1986). Information Quality and The Valuation of New Issues. Journal Of Accounting and Economics, 8(2), 159-172.
Wikinson, J. W. & Cerullo, M.J. (1997). Accounting Information Systems Essential Concepts and Applications. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Yan, Q., Ji, H., & Cofell, D. (2023). Financial Audit Method Innovation of Qinghai Energy Enterprises Based On Panel Data Regression Model. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2023, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6093443
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
The Author(s) must make formal transfer of copyright for each article prior to publication in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences. Such transfer enables the Journal to defend itself against plagiarism and other forms of copyright infringement. Your cooperation is appreciated. You agree that copyright of your article to be published in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences is hereby transferred, throughout the World and for the full term and all extensions and renewals thereof, to International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences.
The Author(s) reserve(s): (a) the trademark rights and patent rights, if any, and (b) the right to use all or part of the information contained in this article in future, non-commercial works of the Author's own, or, if the article is a "work-for-hire" and made within the scope of the Author's employment, the employer may use all or part of the information contained in this article for intra-company use, provided the usual acknowledgements are given regarding copyright notice and reference to the original publication.
The Author(s) warrant(s) that the article is Author's original work, and has not been published before. If excerpts from copyrighted works are included, the Author will obtain written permission from the copyright owners and shall credit the sources in the article. The author also warrants that the article contains no libelous or unlawful statements, and does not infringe on the rights of others. If the article was prepared jointly with other Author(s), the Author agrees to inform the co-Author(s) of the terms of the copyright transfer and to sign on their behalf; or in the case of a "work-for-hire" the employer or an authorized representative of the employer.
The journal is registered with the ISSN : 1925-4423.
IJCEAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
