Understanding Energy Poverty through the Perspective of Trade Openness and Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Case for Selected Latin American Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16452460Schlagworte:
Energy Poverty, Access to Electricity, Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment, Economic GlobalizationAbstract
Energy poverty is still one of the critical problems for many countries. For this purpose, we try to assess whether trade openness and foreign direct investment are associated with energy poverty for the panel sample of Belize, Bolivia, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, and Peru, spanning the period 1992-2020. The Panel Vector Auto Regression (PVAR) estimation results indicate that economic growth, trade openness, and foreign direct investment inflow reduce energy poverty by increasing access to electricity in these countries. Further, Panel VAR Granger causality findings show feedback causality linkage between energy poverty and trade openness, energy poverty and foreign direct investment inflow, economic growth and trade openness, and economic growth and foreign direct investment inflow. Moreover, the outcomes indicate that a bidirectional causality exists from economic growth to energy poverty and from trade openness to foreign direct investment inflow.
Literaturhinweise
Acharya, R. H., & Sadath, A. C. (2019). Energy poverty and economic development: Household-level evidence from India. Energy and Buildings, 183, 785-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.047
Adom, P. K., Amuakwa-Mensah, F., Agradi, M. P., & Nsabimana, A. (2021). Energy poverty, development outcomes, and transition to green energy. Renewable Energy, 178, 1337-1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.120
Aigheyisi, O. S., & Oligbi, B. O. (2020). Energy poverty and economic development in Nigeria: Empirical Analysis. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 183-193.
Al-Mulali, U., Fereidouni, H. G., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). Electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources and economic growth: Evidence from Latin American countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 290-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.006
Alshubiri, F., Elheddad, M., Jamil, S. A., & Djellouli, N. (2021). The impacts of financial depth and foreign direct investment on the green and non-green energy consumption of OPEC members. SN Business & Economics, 1(77), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00075-4
Al-Tal, R., Murshed, M., Ahmad, P., Alfar, A. J. K., Bassim, M., Elheddad, M., Nurmakhanova, M., & Mahmood, H. (2021). The non-linear effects of energy efficiency gains on the incidence of energy poverty. Sustainability, 13, 11055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911055
Aluko, O. A., Opoku, E. E. O., Ibrahim, M., & Kufuor, N. K. (2023). Put on the light! Foreign direct investment, governance and access to electricity. Energy Economics, 119, 106563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106563
Amin, A., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Chandio, A. A., Rasool, S. F., Luo, J., & Zaman, S. (2020). How does energy poverty affect economic development? A panel data analysis of South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 31623-31635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09173-6
Anarfo, E. B., Agoba, A. M., Sare, Y. A., & Gameti, D. K. (2021). Energy access and foreign direct investment in an emerging market: The Ghanaian perspective. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 15(5), 969-986. DOI: 10.1108/IJESM-09-2020-0011
Asngar, T. M. (2022). Does financial development improve access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa?. SN Business & Economics, 2(146), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00324-0
Asuamah, S. Y. (2016). Modelling financial development and electricity consumption nexus for Ghana. MPRA Paper 70097. University Library of Munich, Germany. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70097/
Atchike, D. W., Zhao, Z. Y., & Bao, G. (2020). The relationship between electricity consumption, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Case of Benin. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(4), 507-515.
Azam, A., Rafiq, M., Shafique, M., Yuan, J., & Salem, S. (2021). Human Development Index, ICT, and Renewable Energy-Growth Nexus for Sustainable Development: A Novel PVAR Analysis. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. 760758. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.760758
Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615
Barbieri, K., & Reuveny, R. (2005). Economic globalization and civil war. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1228-1247.
Bayar, Y., & Ozturk, O. F. (2018). Impact of foreign direct investment inflows on tax revenues in OECD countries: A panel cointegration and causality analysis. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 25, 31-40.
Biernat-Jarka, A., Trębska, P., & Jarka, S. (2021). The role of renewable energy sources in alleviating energy poverty in households in Poland. Energies, 14, 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102957
Boemi, S. N., & Papadopoulos, A. M. (2019). Energy poverty and energy efficiency improvements: A longitudinal approach of the Hellenic households. Energy and Buildings, 197, 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.027
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-253.
Charfeddine, L., & Kahia, M. (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy, 139, 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
Chien, F., Hsu, C. C., Zhang, Y., Tran, T. D., & Li, L. (2022). Assessing the impact of green fiscal policies and energy poverty on energy efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 4363-4374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15854-7
Couharde, C., & Mouhoud, S. (2020). Fossil fuel subsidies, income inequality, and poverty: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(5), 981-1006. doi: 10.1111/joes.12384
D’Amelio, M., Garrone, P., & Piscitello, L. (2016). Can multinational enterprises light up developing countries? Evidences from the access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 88, 12-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.018
Damigos, D., Kaliampakou, C., Balaskas, A., & Papada, L. (2021). Does energy poverty affect energy efficiency investment decisions? First evidence from a stated choice experiment. Energies, 14, 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061698
Destek, M. A. (2020). Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: Evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 33601-33614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
Doğanalp, N., Ozsolak, B., & Aslan, A. (2021). The effects of energy poverty on economic growth: A panel data analysis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 50167-50178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14185-x
Dong, K., Dou, Y., & Jiang, Q. (2022). Income inequality, energy poverty, and energy efficiency: Who cause who and how?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121622
Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38, 1091-1110. DOI: 10.1080/00036840500392078
Duan, R., & Guo, P. (2021). Electricity consumption in China: The effects of financial development and trade openness. Sustainability, 13, 10206. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810206
El Menyari, Y. (2021). The effects of international tourism, electricity consumption, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in North Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 44028-44038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13818-5
Foo, N., Lean, H. H., & Salim, R. (2021). Energy Poverty and the Impact of Wellbeing in ASEAN under China’s Foreign Aid. USAEE Working Paper No. 21-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3918379
González-Eguino, M. (2015). Energy poverty: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.013
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J. E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index-revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Hamed, T. A., & Peric, K. (2020). The role of renewable energy resources in alleviating energy poverty in Palestine. Renewable Energy Focus, 35, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2020.09.006
Henry, C. L., Baker, J. S., Shaw, B. K., Kondash, A. J., Leiva, B., Castellanos, E., Wade, C. M., Lord, B., Houtven, G. V., & Redmon, J. H. (2021). How will renewable energy development goals affect energy poverty in Guatemala?. Energy Economics, 104. 105665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105665
Hu, Y., & Zheng, J. (2021). Is green credit a good tool to achieve “double carbon” goal? Based on coupling coordination model and PVAR model. Sustainability, 13, 14074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132414074
Igawa, M., & Managi, S. (2022). Energy poverty and income inequality: An economic analysis of 37 countries. Applied Energy, 306, 118076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118076
Judson, E., Zirakbash, F., Nygaard, A., & Spinney, A. (2019). Renewable energy retrofitting and energy poverty in low-income households. Research Report for United Housing Cooperative, 1-56.
Kaygusuz, K. (2011). Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 936-947. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.003
Koomson, I., & Danquah, M. (2021). Financial inclusion and energy poverty: Empirical evidence from Ghana. Energy Economics, 94, 105085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105085
Li, W., Chien, F., Hsu, C. C., Zhang, Y., Nawaz, M. A., Iqbal, S., & Mohsin, M. (2021). Nexus between energy poverty and energy efficiency: Estimating the long-run dynamics. Resources Policy, 72, 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102063
Liu, B., Zhang, L., Liu, C., Wang, D., Sun, J., Luther, M., & Xu, Y. (2019). Measuring energy poverty based on energy embodied in exports of vertical specialisation trade in the construction sector. Energy and Buildings, 196, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.022
Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
Masud, J., Sharan, D., & Lohani, B. N. (2007). Energy for all: Addressing the energy, environment, and poverty nexus in Asia. Asian Development Bank Publication Stock No. 041207.
Mohsin, M., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). Nexus between financial development and energy poverty in Latin America. Energy Policy, 165, 112925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112925
Munyanyi, M. E., & Churchill, S. A. (2022). Foreign aid and energy poverty: Sub-national evidence from Senegal. Energy Economics, 108, 105899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105899
Murshed, M. (2018). Does improvement in trade openness facilitate renewable energy transition? Evidence from selected South Asian economies. South Asia Economic Journal, 19(2), 151-170. DOI: 10.1177/1391561418794691
Muthusamy, D. A., & Negi, R. (2020). Does foreign direct investment induces societal development in India. GATR Journal of Finance and Banking Review, 5(1), 32-38.
Nguea, S. M., Kaguendo, U. V. E., & Noumba, I. (2022). Are growth effects of foreign capital significant for increasing access to electricity in Africa?. Energy Policy, 168, 113129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113129
Nguyen, C. P., & Nasir, M. A. (2021). An inquiry into the nexus between energy poverty and income inequality in the light of global evidence. Energy Economics, 99, 105289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105289
Njiru, C. W., & Letema, S. C. (2018). Energy poverty and its implication on standard of living in Kirinyaga, Kenya. Journal of Energy, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196567
Obeng, G. Y., Evers, H. D., Akuffo, F. O., Braimah, I., & Brew-Hammond, A. (2008). Solar photovoltaic electrification and rural energy-poverty in Ghana. Energy for Sustainable Development, XII(1), 19-30.
OECD (2019). Sustainable results in development: Using the SDGs for shared results and impact. OECD Publishing: Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/368cf8b4-en
Onuonga, S. M. (2020). Economic growth, electricity access, and remittances in Kenya. Management and Economics Research Journal, 6(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18639/MERJ.2020.1100554
Our World in Data (2024a). Number of people without access to electricity. Calculated by Our World in Data based on the World Bank.
Our World in Data (2024b). Data adapted from Data compiled from multiple sources by World Bank. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-as-share-of-gdp
Pereira, M. G., Freitas, M. A. V., & Da Silva, N. F. (2010). Rural electrification and energy poverty: Empirical evidences from Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 1229-1240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.12.013
Pereira, M. G., Freitas, M. A. V., & Da Silva, N. F. (2011). The challenge of energy poverty: Brazilian case study. Energy Policy, 39(1), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.025
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11, 105-127. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50-93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Rafindadi, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Effects of financial development, economic growth and trade on electricity consumption: Evidence from post-Fukushima Japan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1073-1084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.023
Raghutla, C., & Chittedi, K. R. (2022). Energy poverty and economic development: Evidence from BRICS economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 9707-9721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16174-6
Salite, D., Kirshner, J., Cotton, M., Howe, L., Cuamba, B., Feijó, J., & Macome, A. Z. (2021). Electricity access in Mozambique: A critical policy analysis of investment, service reliability and social sustainability. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102123
Shangquan, G. (2000). Economic globalization: Trends, risks and risk prevention. Economic & Social Affairs, CDP Backround Paper No. 1, 1-8.
Sovacool, B. K. (2013). Energy access and energy security in Asia and the Pacific. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 383.
Shyu, C. W. (2014). Ensuring access to electricity and minimum basic electricity needs as a goal for the post-MDG development agenda after 2015. Energy for Sustainable Development, 19, 29-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2013.11.005
Shyu, C. W. (2022). Energy poverty alleviation in Southeast Asian countries: Policy implications for improving access to electricity. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1770426
Tariq, G., Sun, H., Fernandez-Gamiz, U., Mansoor, S., Pasha, A. A., Ali, S., & Khan, M. S. (2023). Effects of globalization, foreign direct investment and economic growth on renewable electricity consumption. Heliyon, 9, e14635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14635
Tiwari, A. K. (2011). Comparative performance of renewable and nonrenewable energy source on economic growth and CO2 emissions of Europe and Eurasian countries: A PVAR approach. Economics Bulletin, 31(3), 2356-2372.
United Nations (2015). Goal 7-Ensure Access to Affordable, Reliable, Sustainable and Modern Energy for All. [Retrieved 2022-09-05] Available at: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/goal-7-ensure-access-affordable-reliable-sustainable-and-modern-energy-all#:~:text=SDG%207%E2%80%94to%20%E2%80%9Censure%20access,statement%20of%20the%20goal%20itself
Wang, W., Xiao, W., & Bai, C. (2022). Can renewable energy technology innovation alleviate energy poverty? Perspective from the marketization level. Technology in Society, 68, 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101933
Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 193-233. DOI: 10.1002/jae.967
World Bank (2021). Report: Universal Access to Sustainable Energy Will Remain Elusive Without Addressing Inequalities. [Retrieved 2022-08-04] Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/06/07/report-universal-access-to-sustainable-energy-will-remain-elusive-without-addressing-inequalities#:~:text=Since%202010%2C%20more%20than%20a,fragile%20and%20conflict%2Daffected%20settings
World Bank (2022). World Development Indicator. [Retrieved 2022-08-05] Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/
World Economic Forum (2010). Energy Poverty Action.
Zhao, J., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). How renewable energy alleviate energy poverty? A global analysis. Renewable Energy, 186, 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.005
Zhao, X., Ramzan, M., Sengupta, T., Sharma, G. D., Shahzad, U., & Cui, L. (2022). Impacts of bilateral trade on energy affordability and accessibility across Europe: Does economic globalization reduce energy poverty?. Energy and Buildings, 262, 112023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112023
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
The Author(s) must make formal transfer of copyright for each article prior to publication in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences. Such transfer enables the Journal to defend itself against plagiarism and other forms of copyright infringement. Your cooperation is appreciated. You agree that copyright of your article to be published in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences is hereby transferred, throughout the World and for the full term and all extensions and renewals thereof, to International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences.
The Author(s) reserve(s): (a) the trademark rights and patent rights, if any, and (b) the right to use all or part of the information contained in this article in future, non-commercial works of the Author's own, or, if the article is a "work-for-hire" and made within the scope of the Author's employment, the employer may use all or part of the information contained in this article for intra-company use, provided the usual acknowledgements are given regarding copyright notice and reference to the original publication.
The Author(s) warrant(s) that the article is Author's original work, and has not been published before. If excerpts from copyrighted works are included, the Author will obtain written permission from the copyright owners and shall credit the sources in the article. The author also warrants that the article contains no libelous or unlawful statements, and does not infringe on the rights of others. If the article was prepared jointly with other Author(s), the Author agrees to inform the co-Author(s) of the terms of the copyright transfer and to sign on their behalf; or in the case of a "work-for-hire" the employer or an authorized representative of the employer.
The journal is registered with the ISSN : 1925-4423.
IJCEAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
