Framing COP28: How Political Cartoons Interpreted Climate Politics and Global Environmental Conflicts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18190463

Keywords:

Political Humor, Cartoon, COP28, Climate Crisis, Environmental Communication

Abstract

This study examines how political cartoons framed the climate politics of the COP28 Summit held in the United Arab Emirates in 2023. Political cartoons are widely recognized as a significant form of political humor that can shape public understanding and extend the boundaries of political debate. Despite their growing use in environmental communication, there is limited research on how cartoons construct frames around global climate negotiations. To address this gap, the study analyzes 72 political cartoons using content analysis and framing analysis. The findings show that COP28 was predominantly framed through four themes—fossil fuel industry influence, greenwashing, political incompetence, and the climate crisis. These themes were further articulated through environmental, political, economic, and blame-oriented frames. The study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how political cartoons function as discursive tools that critique climate governance and highlight perceived inconsistencies in global climate politics.

References

Alisat, S. & Riemer, M. (2015). The Environmental Action Scale: Development Psychometric Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 13-23.

Baumgartner, J. C. (2019). Introduction. In American political humor: Masters of satire and their impact on U.S. policy and culture (pp. xxi–xxv). ABC-CLIO.

Becker, A. B. (2014). Playing with Politics: Online Political Parody, Affinity for Political Humor, Anxiety Reduction, and Implications for Political Efficacy. Mass Communication and Society. 17, 424-445.

Benoit, W. L., & McHale, J. P (2003). Presidential candidates’ television spots and personal qualities. Southern Communication Journal, 68, 319–334.

Benoit, W. L., Klyukovski, A. A., Mchale, J. P. & Airne, D. (2001) ‘‘A Fantasy Theme Analysis of Political Cartoons on the Clinton-Lewinsky -Starr Affair’’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18, 377-394.

Berger, A. A. (2017). An Anatomy of Humor. New York: Routledge Press.

Borden, S. L., & Tew, C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from “fake” news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(4), 300–314.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Resarch Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.

Dalton, R. J. (2005). The greening of the globe? Cross-national levels of environmental group membership. Environmental Politics, 14, 441–459

Dalton, R. J. (2015). Waxing or Waning? The Changing Patterns of Environmental Activism. 24(4), 530-552.

Edelman, M. J. (1993). Contestable Categories and Public Opinion. Political Communication, 10(3), 231-242.

Edwards, J. L. (1997). Political cartoons in the 1988 Pial campaign: Image, metaphor and narrative. New York, NY/London, UK: Garland Publishing

Edwards, J. L. & Winkler, C. K. (1997). ‘‘Representative Form and the Visual Ideograph: the Iwo Jima image in editorial cartoons’’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 83, 239-310.

Einsiedel, E. F., Remillard, C., Gomaa, M., & Zeaiter, E. (2017). The Representation of Biofuels in Political Cartoons: Ironies, Contradictions and Moral Dilemmas. Environmental Communication. 11(1), 41-62.

Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. 43(4), 51-58.

Feldman, O. (2024). Humor and Politics: A Conceptual Introduction. In (Ofer Feldman, Ed.). Political Humor Worldwide: The Cultural Context of Political Comedy, Satire, and Parody. (pp. 1-30). Singapore: Springer Publishing.

Felicia, O. (2021). A Social Semiotic Analysis of Gender Power in Nigeria’s Newspaper Political Cartoons. Social Semiotics, 31(2), 266-281.

Fielding, K. S., R. McDonald, & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (4): 318–26.

Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.

Goffmann, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Free Press.

Graber, D. (2008). Why political humor is serious business. In J. C. Baumgartner & J. S. Morris (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age. New York, NY: Routledge.

Gray, J., Jones, J. P., & Thompson, E. (2009). Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post- network era. New York University Press.

Hariman, R. (2008). Political Parody and Public Culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94, 247-272.

Hecke, M. V. (2017). Imag(in)ing the eurocrisis: a comparative analysis of political cartoons. National Identities, 19(1), 129-147.

Holmes, D., Garas, B., & Richardson, L. M. (2022). Australian Newspaper Framing of Renewables: The Case of Snowy Hydro 2.0. Environmental Communication. 16(1), 23-42.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. London: Sage Publications.

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication. 4(1), 70-81.

Mackay, J. B. (2016). What Does Society Owe Political Cartoonists? Journalism Studies. 18(1), 28-44.

Martin, R. A. (2006). The Pschology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge: Academic Press.

Medhurst, M. J. & Desousa, M. A. (1981). Political Cartoons as Rhetorical Form: a taxonomy of graphic discourse’’, Communication Monographs 48, pp. 197-236.

Morrison, S. S. (1992). The feminization of the German Democratic Republic in political cartoons, 1989–90. Journal of Popular Culture, 25(4), 35–52.

Neas, S., Ward, A., & Bowman, B. (2022). Young People’s Climate Activism: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Political Science. 4:940876

Nordenstam, A., & Wictorin, M. W. (2023). Climate Activism – Contemporary Swedish Feminist Comics. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics. 14(5), 735-747.

Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framin Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-76.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publishing.

Peifer, J. T. (2012). Can We Be Funny? The Social Responsibility of Political Humor. Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 27, 263-276.

Peng, M., & Zhong, X. (2021). When Environmental Activism Meets Local Governance: The Role of Government Transparency and Responsiveness in China. Society & Natural Resources 34(4), 484-504.

Pyatt, S. T. M. (2011). Explaining Environmental Activism. Society and Natural Resources. 25, 683-699.

Romano, S. K., & Westgate, V. (2007). BLAMING BUSH: An Analysis of Political Cartoons Following Hurricane Katrina. Journalism Studies. 8(5), 755-773.

Rootes, C. (2003). Environmental protest in Western Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Sanders, B. (1996). Sudden Glory: Laughter as Subversive History. Boston: Beacon Press.

Scott, J. C. (1987). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1992). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Soler, D. M., Mateu, A., & Dominguez, M. (2022). Incendiary Humor: Climate Change, Biodiversity, and Politics in Wildfire Cartoons. Environmental Communication, 16(3), 296-303.

Sørensen, M. J. (2016). Humour in Political Activism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Templin, C. (1999). Hillary Clinton as threat to gender norms: Cartoon images of the First Lady. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23(1), 20–36.

Vultee, F. (2007). Dr. FDR & Baby War: The World Through Chicago Political Cartoons Before and after Pearl Harbor. Visual Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 158-175,

Wickberg, D. (2014). Humor, etymology of. In S. Attardo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Humor Studies (ss. 350-351). California: Sage.

Xi, Rui. (2025). A boon or a bane: Multimodal Figurative framing in Chinese and Foreign BRI-themed Cartoons. Social Semiotics. 1-27.

Young, D. G. (2016). Humor and satire, political. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 487–494). Wiley.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

SATIR, M. E. (2025). Framing COP28: How Political Cartoons Interpreted Climate Politics and Global Environmental Conflicts. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 1351–1366. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18190463